European and Mexican laws promote war in Chiapas
Armed attack on Zapatista coffee cooperative in Mexico
Militarization and land conflicts in southern Mexico
There have been armed attacks by paramilitary groups on Zapatista communities in southern Mexico for some time now and violence is on the rise overall. Human rights organizations such as Frayba and the Indigenous Congress CNI are now speaking of a war against the indigenous population, which is being promoted and supported by the government in order to break protests and resistance against megaprojects and to destroy local self-governing structures of communities.
Drug cartels and military structures have gained a massive presence in the region, particularly as a result of megaprojects such as the so called „Maya“ train. The rainforest on the Yucatán peninsula is to be opened up for tourism, mining projects and industry. A swathe of devastation is being cut through the ecosystems to create infrastructure. There is a „gold-rush atmosphere“, while state repression against environmentalists, corruption, armed activities and murders are also on the rise.
The new laws create the basis for the privatization of farmland. Under the name of ecological and social programmes, among other things, traditionally communal land is being privatized and made available for commercial development. Once land is registered for a owner – as a prerequisite for participation in the programs – it can then be acquired by investors. This development threatens to turn back the clock on the land distribution that began in the course of the never-completed revolution for land and freedom at the beginning of the 20th century.
European politics intensifies conflicts
The EU does not sanction the attacks on indigenous communities and the destruction of the rainforest, but instead promotes them and profits from them. Trade agreements create favorable framework conditions for the entry of German and European investors and corporations. At the same time, laws such as the EU regulation on deforestation-free supply chains are enacted, which postulate that they want to protect indigenous communities, but are directed against them in their formulation and practical consequences.
This ‚Rainforest Protection Act‘ requires smallholder farmers to geo-map their land so that green coffee can still be imported into the EU in the future. By comparing satellite images, the aim is to prevent rainforest areas from being cleared for plantations. The idea originates from the control of the timber industry, but can hardly be transferred to the realities of smallholder, indigenous forms of production.
Indigenous communities do not cultivate coffee as a plantation, but often traditionally as diversified cultivation under shade trees in the secondary rainforest. At the same time, land is often communally used. Through privatization and the implementation of techniques such as geo-mapping and the resulting trade regulations, the framework conditions for access to the land and its gold plating by corrupt politicians, drug cartels, investors and multinational corporations are being massively expanded or created in the first place.
In the Mexican reality, the rainforest is not protected by the EU. Instead, its policies and legislation attack sustainable cultivation methods and civil society structures, and instead promote land conflicts, overexploitation and corporate interests. When the European institutions drafted the deforestation-free regulation, did they actually ask themselves how many trees were felled for the „Maya“ train railroad? And what part do companies such as Deutsche Bahn play in this destruction and how can they be sanctioned? As the Café Libertad collective, we will publish a position paper as soon as possible that clarifies our criticism of the EU’s rainforest regulation.
Indigenous perspectives instead of neo-colonial regulation
In response to the escalating war in Chiapas, the Zapatistas have also dissolved their previous self-administration structures and created new, more grassroots-oriented autonomy structures. In response to the increasing land conflicts, they have also declared that in future they will increasingly campaign in the communities for communally used land areas and manage these by free agreement as non-property. In Europe, such forms of communal ownership were known as commons and were widespread. With the rise of capitalism and as a result of industrialization, they were largely transformed into bourgeois property relations.
The current EU laws are also directed against such forms of communal cultivation, especially when compared with Mexican realities. Property titles and legal regulations for the capitalist development of „natural resources“ do not create a better climate, sustainable cultivation or rainforest protection. They are part of a neo-colonial policy that is primarily concerned with securing European interests and goals in international competition, while at the same time promoting conflicts in the Global South.
Instead of interest-driven regulations and lobby politics, we focus on strengthening indigenous producers and their self-organized associations as well as on solidarity with environmental activists. Instead of bureaucratic centralism and organizations that implement it, we rely on resistance and local experience. Indigenous communities bring with them their own understanding of sustainability and diverse knowledge, which must be heard and defended as autonomous practice.
Zapata vive!
Café Libertad Kollektiv, 2nd of may 2024
Source of English translation (thanks!): https://netz-der-rebellion.org/2024/05/03/armed-attack-on-zapatista-coffee-cooperative-in-mexico/